Discussion:
X-Men 3 Script Review
(too old to reply)
The Matt Hardy Show Aficiando
2005-06-13 17:01:34 UTC
Permalink
AICN EXCLUSIVE! X3 Script Review! Plus An Open Letter To Tom Rothman And Fox
Stockholders!!
Hi, everyone. "Moriarty" here with some Rumblings From The Lab...
Okay, I know, I know. I'm late with this. But you can thank Earthlink for
that. Nine days without service of any kind. Amazing. I was starting to
think that Avi Arad and Fox had paid Earthlink to crash my service.
Now, before we begin, let's clarify a few things. Harry and I have not read
the X-MEN 3 script, any version of it. We've got a new spy who has, though,
and I've been able to verify that the version of the script he read was the
"six-day-draft" that Simon Kinberg and Zak Penn wrote under the supervision
of Matthew Vaughn. I like both Kinberg and Penn as writers, and I know that
both of them are genuinely going to try to do right by the characters.
However, this isn't a case of two writers doing whatever they want. If it
were, I don't think there'd be anything to worry about.
You want to know who the main villain of X3 is going to be? Tom Rothman.
One of the reasons I started reading AICN, before I ever contributed
anything to it, was because it demystified the development process. So
often, blame (or credit) is assigned by fans to people for no particular
reason. It's easy to point a finger at a director or at a writer or even at
a company like Marvel and assume that they were responsible for something,
but having gone through the development process several times now for
different studios (including Fox), I can tell you that more often than not,
the truly terrible decisions can come from people whose names you never see
onscreen.
When I call Rothman a villain, I'm well aware of how loaded that word is. I
can't think of anything more shocking this year, though, than the speech he
gave at this year's Saturn Awards. Here's a show specifically designed to
celebrate genre, a room filled with SF, fantasy, and horror filmmakers, and
Tom Rothman gets up and not only lambasts everyone who writes about those
genres, but also has the nerve to call himself a geek.
You, sir, are no geek. A geek would not have stripmined the ALIEN and
PREDATOR franchises the way you did. A geek would not consistently value
release dates and fiscal quarters over getting material right. Listening to
him talk about what a friend he is to genre filmmakers was akin to being at
a Shoah Foundation dinner where the guest of honor was Joseph Goebbels. This
is the guy who chased Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin off an ID4 sequel
after they made $600 million for the studio because he wanted to pay them
half of what they made on the first film. This is the man who browbeat
Stephen Norrington until he quit the business altogether. This is the guy
who almost convinced Alex Proyas to give up filmmaking. How many genre
filmmakers... great genre filmmakers... do you see returning to Fox over and
over to make their films? And why, exactly, do you think that is?
By the way, Rothman... telling a ballroom full of people that you're a geek
because you fuck the star of SUSPIRIA and PHANTOM OF THE PARADISE every
night? Classy. Very, very classy. But still... not the point.
If you're a Fox stockholder, now is the time to be concerned. X-MEN is the
only proven major franchise that Fox currently has up and running. Who knows
if FANTASTIC FOUR is going to work or not? Maybe it'll be great. Maybe it
won't. ALIEN VS PREDATOR marked the end of two franchises at the same time.
STAR WARS was never yours in the first place. Studios depend on these types
of films. There's a reason they're called tentpoles. This is what you build
the entire rest of your release year around. If you manage one of these
properties the right way, it's the gift that keeps on giving. Look at the
way Sony has handled SPIDER-MAN so far. As soon as they release one, they
start developing the next one, giving them plenty of time to get the script
just right. They don't start shooting until this winter, but they're already
doing FX and costume tests, and they're deep into the writing process based
on an outline that Sam Raimi and his brother have been tweaking since last
year.
You know when Rothman finally gave the go-ahead to start putting together
the treatment for X-MEN 3? This February. I'm a chronic procrastinator, and
even I think that's piss-poor time management, man.
Here's the thing about X-MEN. It may be one of the most flexible and durable
film franchises I've ever seen. By the very nature of who the X-Men are, you
can rotate cast in and out of the series without having to scrap continuity.
This is already off to a better financial and creative start than the Bond
franchise was, and you see the legs on that one. Why, then, would you allow
a personal grudge to lead you to make decisions that will not only kill the
golden goose, but also rape it and eat it?
And make no mistake... the rush to make that Memorial Day 2006 release date
is about beating Bryan Singer to the screen. The acrimony involved in the
Singer/Fox break-up is rich enough to write an entire book about, especially
if it leads to the destruction of the franchise. This could turn into one of
the all-time great displays of executive hubris in Hollywood. You want to
know why you lost Singer to Warner Bros. and SUPERMAN in the first place?
Because you took over a year to negotiate his deal to direct X-MEN 3. That
should have been one of the biggest no-brainer decisions you could have ever
made, but maybe you have to have a brain to make a no-brainer decision. You
strung him along and strung him along and strung him along, and then when
you had finally proven to him that you weren't going to make things easy...
you were too late. Alan Horn took full advantage of Bryan's
almost-fetishistic love of Donner's SUPERMAN and your hesitancy, and he
stole him from you. I don't know what's funnier... throwing Bryan off the
lot using security guards, or the fact that you had to let him back on the
lot immediately thereafter so he could shoot HOUSE for the studio.
What's really amazing is how X-MEN was something Rothman hated from the
start, no matter what he says now in public. I've spoken to at least ten
people close to the production who have provided me with laundry lists of
the ways that Rothman tried to fuck up the first film. Remember when they
cut the budget and moved up the release date on the first X-MEN? You know
why? Rothman was cutting his losses. He really, truly anticipated that the
film would come out and vanish without a trace, and he would finally be rid
of what he saw as a corporate albatross. Instead, the film clicked, and on
the second film, Bryan Singer and his writers and the producers were all
able to muster enough muscle to get Fox to give them the room they needed to
make something even better.
That must have stuck in Rothman's craw something fierce, and that's what led
to that massive slow-down after X-MEN 2. They should have made Bryan's deal
the following week, and they should have also locked in Dougherty and Harris
and Tom DeSanto and Lauren Shuler-Donner and Ralph Winter and the entire
production team and the cast and everyone else that was part of the creative
alchemy that made the first two films work. I remember one year at BNAT when
Tom DeSanto talked about the way they had been planting the seeds of the
Dark Phoenix storyline and several others since the very first scenes of the
first X-MEN. Who knows? Maybe someday Marvel will let DeSanto and Singer do
a graphic novel or a limited-run series where they do the story they had in
mind for X3 and X4 on the comics page so we can at least see where the films
were originally headed. As it is, Rothman's firmly back in charge of the
franchise now, and that distaste for the material seems to be seeping back
in.
Which is not to say that all the news is bad.
When I was first contacted by The Big Hurt, our new spy, I almost dismissed
the review he sent us. Too much detail is almost always the giveaway for
someone trying to troll you. But I was able to verify this with multiple
sources all the way up the chain of command at Fox and Marvel, and I can
tell you... even though some of the details of the script are still being
hammered out, the spine of what you're going to see onscreen next summer is
right here. Harry seems to have implied in some of what he's written that he
feels this is an unmitigated disaster. I'm not so sure yet. I do know that
there are some valid complaints here, particularly regarding the way the
main menace of the film is almost a carbon-copy of the menace from the last
film. Also, one of Rothman's chuckle-headed notions that he kept trying to
shoehorn into the first film, the idea of Storm and Wolverine having a
steamy sexual relationship, has resurfaced now. Gee, I wonder why. But there
's stuff here that I like, and it sounds like there are some amazing
sequences in store. Keep in mind also that what our spy read was rough, so
even if the substance of a scene was right in the draft he read, the way it'
s actually handled may be very different in the final version. Dialogue, the
description of certain effects, the way an action scene is fleshed out... it
's still early days yet. And even with all those caveats, this is mostly a
positive review.
I've really wrestled with how much to reveal of the spoilers, too. In the
end, I hope we've erred on the side of caution, but I want to give you a
sense of exactly why Avi Arad calls this "the most controversial film of the
series."
Next summer, Fox is cleaning house, and there are going to be a lot of
bodies on the bonfire. Check this out:
If it's an X3 bonanza you wanted, let's get it going all the way, ay.

(Warning: Spoilers! And also a side note: I've only read the first two acts
as the third act was locked down tighter than a Sharon Stone Basic Instinct
vice grip on Michael Douglas' groin.)

"A large silver BLADE slices through the black screen. Wolverine's claw?

No. It is a STRAIGHT RAZOR, gleaming on a white counter in-

INT. UPSCALE BATHROOM - DAY

More MACRO SHOTS of: a rope, rubbing alcohol, steel brush, other strange
instruments. Suddenly, we hear KNOCKING.

INT. PENTHOUSE HALLWAY - DAY

WARREN WORTHINGTON SENIOR, a patrician father in an expensive suit, knocks
on the door. Concerned.

WARREN SENIOR

Warren, son, what are you doing in there?"

Yeah, so it gets bloody. Junior is trying to cut himself. But unlike the
normal teenager who does it to alleviate pain by causing pain, he's actually
trying to cut something right out of himself. He's trying to cut the mutant
right out of his body; he's trying to cut off his wings. But the blonde boy
is unsuccessful, and we're given Warren Jr. (not officially Angel just yet)
as our first new X-Men character.

The very next scene shows a young Xavier and a young Erik Lensherr (Magneto)
in the back seat of a car driven by a furry blue Beast of a man. The two
have a conversation that is essentially a prequel of their confrontations to
come. They are friends now, but combative and, in Erik's case, somewhat
competitive.

As their car slows down, the name on the mailbox outside the car is
revealed - GREY. Both Xavier and Erik walk in confidently. Erik makes
mention of not wanting to meet "every one of them in person," and Xavier
responds that "this one is special." This interior scene parallels the
Iceman/parents scene from X2, except Jean is only 13 and pretty obviously
powerful beyond her years. She's already reading Xavier's thoughts and she
manages to lift the entire neighborhood street's worth of cars into the air.
This isn't the same Jean Grey we've known and loved in the first two films.
This is something different.

Finally, the last introduction scene gives us a revisiting of the White
House scene from the opening of X2.

"INT. WHITE HOUSE - HALLWAYS - DAY

A large, blue figure passes the PRESIDENTIAL SEAL on the wall. Something is
moving, fast, through the corridors of the White House. It is eerily
reminiscent of another blue creature at the start of another movie.

We see more glimpses of this thing: his big blue furry feet move deeper and
deeper into the core of the building. Finally, he swoops past two MARINE
GUARDS with machine-guns.

By the time they look up, he is already gliding through an imposing,
high-tech door with the Presidential Seal over the words SITUATION ROOM. An
alarm BEEPS, as we.

CUT TO:

INT. WHITE HOUSE - SITUATION ROOM - DAY

PRESIDENT

You're late, Hank.

On the monitors, scanners have identified his genetic signature: HENRY
MCCOY. SECRETARY OF MUTANT AFFAIRS. The alarms go silent.

HANK

Sorry, Mr. President. Traffic on the beltway."

It seems the new presidency is much more accepting of mutantkind. But here
we see what is both one of the strengths and one of the weaknesses of this
script as a whole. The parallels to the first two films don't go away. In
fact, we see more of the exact same. In both the first two films, we had
interesting and hearty character interactions and rapports, a well-developed
villain in Magneto who is more greyly shaded than many realize, and some fun
intros and boisterous second acts. Again, we have some interesting character
introductions (heck, with such a plethora of good characters to choose from,
it'd be hard not to get most of these right), and I'll get into both Beast's
and Angel's effective scenes in just a bit. But the villainous sidekicks
always seem to get reduced to near Bane-like levels of idiocy (Sabretooth in
X1, Lady Deathstrike in X2, and in X3 we have a listless Juggernaut, who is
nothing more than a henchman among Magneto's Brotherhood.) Also, the second
act in X3 doesn't cook nearly as much as the Military vs. the School of
Mutants in X2, and it's more discombobulated, like some of the scenes out of
X1. We need one X-Men member to shine in the second act and basically take
over the show (like Wolvie did in the school), but we're not given that
here.

Also, the main arching plot in these films is always some lame attempt by
someone to change mutants to humans, humans to mutants, or kill one or the
other. It's no different in this script, too, as the plot consists mainly of
Worthington Sr.'s plan to de-mutant the collective homo sapien superiors of
the world by injecting them with a de-mutant serum. That's right. A frikkin'
de-mutant serum that glows blue. What is it with the writers for this series
and their fascination with serums and machines that alter genetic make-ups?
So no, there is no Apocalypse. There are no Sentinels. What we have here is
a good ol' fashioned serum of death as our enemy of choice. And to prove it
works, we get a firsthand glimpse of our favorite pseudo-naked blue mutant,
Mystique, as she is injected with the serum and she becomes a no-longer-blue
version of herself - I just hope she's still naked when the transformation
occurs.

Ok ok, it's not all bad. There's a prison break sequence involving a bunch
of bad muties on Alcatraz Island. Magneto, amidst all the hubbub of the
deadly serum, has once again decided to fight the homo sapiens with his homo
superior force. Amongst those that he breaks out are Avalanche, Cannonball,
and.

"That Cajun-looking fellow with a thick mop of hair: GAMBIT"

Also among those broken out of the prison is one Cain Marko, otherwise known
as Juggernaut. But as mentioned above, he serves no other purpose than to be
a lowly henchman for Magneto for the first two acts. What a complete and
utter letdown. Gambit, too, doesn't have anything interesting to do in the
first two acts. His appearance is nothing more than a cameo, although he
could play a role in the deciding fight at the end of the film, no doubt.
Lastly, there is one prisoner who defies all laws of mutantcy and actually
masks other mutants' abilities whenever they near him. His name is Leech,
and he is the focal point of the serum. Much like in X2, we have a pretty
lame mutant who provides some sort of bodily secretion for a crazed man
wanting to get rid of mutantkind - lame and vapid writing if you ask me. The
scene ends with Magneto destroying the Golden Gate Bridge in order to build
a new bridge for he and the escaped muties to flee on. His powers are on
awesome display, and I again wonder why it is that he doesn't just kill
anyone in his path if his powers are so unbelievably strong. And if you say
it's because of Xavier, well, just keep reading.

On the X-Men front, Rogue is having trouble with Ice Man because they can't
touch each other. He begins flirting with Kitty Pride (aka Maggie Grace from
"Lost"), and Rogue decides the mutant "cure" might be her best and only
option to be with Bobby long-term. She also attends Brotherhood meetings,
although the script is unclear if it's because she's spying on them or if
she actually is contemplating joining. Rogue is again given one of the
roundest and most dynamic roles in the film, and it's too bad the script can
't find a way to make her more of a centerpiece instead of the occasional
side moment. On the cool side of things (both literally and figuratively),
Bobby and Kitty both share time in none other than the Danger Room. It's a
relatively short sequence, and it's not all that well-written (of all the
things you could do in something as neat as the Danger Room, why have a
bunch of bullets flying at two mutants during a World War II setting?!?),
but at least it's given a nod in this film instead of completely forgotten
about in the others. It's easy to feel Bobby's teenage desires kick in here
over his loyalty and relationship with the untouchable Rogue. The X-Men
scripts nail the interpersonal relationships of the X-Men and the
Brotherhood (well, at least as far as Magneto and Mystique are concerned),
and this film is no exception.

Beast has an interesting scene with Iceman and Kitty Pride when they
infiltrate the Worthington company to decipher if the advertised mutant
"cure" is for real or not. If done right, it could be one of the best
sequences in the first two acts. The key will be getting Beast's super
dexterity to a realistically believable level. The script describes his
movements as:

"breathtaking to behold. He is beyond agile, a blur of acrobatic blue fur.
He works his way through the final gauntlet of security, and enters the main
lab, where he snatches a sample of the cure."

I just don't want to end up with a big CGI-fest of movements like those that
Yoda or the Emperor perform in Episode III. Talk about jarring and pulling
you out of any semblance of reality. ugh. And the Kelsey Grammer casting isn
't exactly awe-inspiring either. Beast could end up being a cluster-fuck of
a character if they don't nail his CGI appearance and movements down.

Finally, in terms of the X-Men, my favorite scene in the script involves
Warren Jr.'s decision to not undergo the "cure" to his mutant birth. With
his wings held under his trench coat by a complex harness, the scene
unfolds.

"WARREN

Wait, I don't want to do this.

WORTHINGTON SR.

Warren, just calm down.

WARREN

No. Stop!

Worthington joins the orderlies in trying to hold him still.

WORTHINGTON SR.

Do it. Quickly!

Warren's thrashing starts loosening the straps. He strains against his
harness and suddenly.

SNAP!

The harness breaks into pieces and.

HIS WINGS UNFURL!

It is a magnificent sight, truly inspiring to behold. Everyone in the room
freezes.

Even his father is speechless. For a moment.

WORTHINGTON SR.

Warren. we discussed this. This is what you want.

WARREN

No. It's what you want.

Seeing the guards blocking the door, Angel spins to the glass windows -

WORTHINGTON SR.

Warren, NO!

And dives through them!

EXT. WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES

The line of mutants look up as glass fragments explode out from the façade
of the building. They watch in awe as.

AN ANGEL SOARS OVER THEM.

Some cross themselves, others merely stare, but none of them will forget
this moment. They shield their eyes as ANGEL disappears into the sky."

I have no idea what they plan on using Angel for in the future (Four
Horsemen of the Apocalypse, anyone?), but he ends up at the X-Mansion at the
end of Act II. It's where he belongs. For what little he is in the script
that I have read, he's given plenty of room to shine. It will be interesting
to see what actor they get for the role and also what part the character
will play in the finale.

Big surprise - Jean Grey does come back, except she's not that shy, selfless
girl learning to find and use her powers anymore. She's something else
entirely, and it's a doozy. They don't call her Phoenix, but it's obvious
she is no longer Doctor Grey. She has very little control of her powers at
first, too. And when I say very little control, I mean it. Take this first
encounter with her when our washed up Cyclops, with full-on scruffy look,
decides to risk a trip back to Alkali Lake.

"The water parts.

Something emerges from the center of the lake.

A flicker gets brighter, lighting the lake.

A creature of PURE ENERGY rises from the depths.

It glows like a living star, emanating wave after wave of telekinetic
energy.

Scott watches, awestruck, as the star slowly descends, and the maelstrom of
gravity passes. As the glow flutters, Scott takes his first step forward.

He is shocked by what he sees in the epicenter:

SCOTT

Jean.?

She is alive. Jean Grey is reborn.

She looks at her limbs, her skin. Stunned, disoriented.

SCOTT (CONT'D)

(muttering)

A dream. Has to be a dream.

But she looks up. She seems real. She blinks, slowly recognizing him,
memories flooding back now.

JEAN

(a whisper)

Scott?

Her voice makes him believe. His tears of pain turn to tears of joy. He
steps toward her.

SCOTT

How. how could you come back?

Jean looks at her limbs again, feeling her power.

JEAN

(still dazed)

I don't know.

Scott doesn't care. He takes her in his arms, and holds her close, hugging
tight. He pulls back, looks at her.

JEAN (CONT'D)

Take these off.

She reaches toward his glasses. He reels back, protecting her. She shakes
her head, feeling her strength.

JEAN (CONT'D)

Trust me. I can control it."

Except she can't. The script describes Scott's skin as "shivering" until he
is simply de-molecularized. No more Cyclops. Poof, he up and vanishes like a
fart in the wind. Now, I don't have a particular fondness for the character
of Cyke, and if he were the only X-Men character that she decimates, it
might actually work for the better. James Marsden was never a particularly
strong actor, and his only legitimate place in the first two films has been
as the thorn in Wolverine's side in acquiring the love of Jean Grey. But
even Wolvie can smell something fishy about this particular version of Jean.
And he finds out from the Professor that Xavier himself put mental blocks in
Jean's mind when she was young (remember the 13-year-old visit?) so that she
couldn't harm anyone with her extraordinary powers.

Unfortunately for Xavier, not only are those mental blocks now gone, but she
also finds out from Magneto that the Professor put those blocks in without
asking her. Big mistake. In a trip back to a setting from the beginning of
the film, both Magneto and his Brotherhood (including henchman-like
Juggernaut) meet Xavier and his X-Men at Jean's old home. Jean, or what's
left of her, is inside and the Professor and Magneto go in alone to see her.
This is when Magneto reveals to her that the Professor was the one who
blocked her mind. She seems none too pleased with this, and the two mental
powerhouses lock minds. [OKAY... HERE'S WHERE I HAD TO REMOVE A CHUNK OF THE
MOST SPOILERY STUFF, SIMPLY BECAUSE I CAN'T RUIN IT IN GOOD CONSCIENCE THIS
FAR AWAY FROM RELEASE - Moriarty]

I guess that's one way to go about writing the Dark Phoenix Saga.

:rolls eyes and makes wretching motions toward the script:

So Cyclops is dead, and an annoying but sexually active Storm has taken his
place as field leader. Magneto is ready to seize his opportunity of freedom
to destroy mankind, although without his most helpful of mutants, Mystique,
who is no longer a member of homo sapien superior-kind. And Phoenix is
flying all crazy-like somewhere, just waiting to de-molecularize the next
person who tries to kiss her or screw with her mind. Act III probably won't
be able to top the first two acts, both in effective character-building
rapport (probably the best thing about the X-Men films, really) as well as
sheer lunacy. The deaths or de-mutantinizations of four important characters
from the first two films absolutely screams of problems with contract
renewals. Oh well. I just hope they get Angela Bassett to lead the X-Men,
because I sure as hell ain't gonna buy into weak-assed Halle Berry leading
the charge.

What works? The character interactions, especially the X-Men, are top-notch.
I'm very wary about the Storm/Wolverine relationship, mostly because the two
don't do anything in the first two acts except screw each other, but besides
that, the interplays between the characters are well done. The threesome of
Bobby, Kitty, and Rogue are developed in a cogent and convincing manner. As
mentioned above, Rogue is given some fleshy material for her character, and
Paquin could run with it. Beast has an honest chance to stand out, too,
although that could be for either good or bad reasons. The character is
given a decent work-up as one of the original X-Men of Xavier's school, and
his interactions with the current X-Men and his physical feats are both
well-written. Is it too much to ask that an actual artist be given the reins
of animating his dexterous moments and blue furry self as opposed to some
vacuous CGI wannabe? I think having a true artist in charge of these CGI
moments is going to be paramount to whether or not Beast actually works
on-screen or not. Also working in the script is Phoenix's electric bursts -
I may not agree with how and why the script makes her do what she does, but
her power is undeniable. Let's just hope that the effects look a little more
interesting and real than the cartoonish fire Jean was emitting at the end
of X2. Magneto, too, is given an interesting moment with Mystique as he
recognizes she has been devolved into a human being. Whereas the X-Men band
together, we see the divisive nature of the Brotherhood in action here, and
it works. Lastly, the character intro for Angel as he flies out the window
is nailed.

What's not so hot? Well, the plot sucks, and that's never a good sign. When
the driving point of the plot is a blue serum derived from a useless mutant
(read: Plot Device), I'd have to say the studio probably got its money's
worth out of the monkey assembly line in the basement. Ouch. If the
Sentinels show up in the third act, it's redeemed. Otherwise, this feels
like a cop-out of sorts. Meanwhile, Wolverine feels like he's been neutered
(or is it just pussy-whipped by Storm?), and really doesn't do much except
hang out with Storm the whole time - not the best use of the most well-known
X-Man around. And Storm's annoying as usual. If they really want to hand the
face of the X-Men over to Halle Berry, woe to the unsuspecting fan who walks
into that theatre. Cyke dying wasn't so horrible (he may've been the glue
for the X-Men team, but he was just anal enough for me not to really care -
plus, as I said above, Marsden was pretty mediocre), but [THE SECOND
CHARACTER TO DIE] went out with almost nothing but a whimper. His character
in this film is severely underdeveloped, and what's worse is that they add
Cain Marko just as [SOMEONE] is killed off? Weirdsville. The Mystique
devolution really blows, too, as she's the only character who could hold a
candle to Magneto on the Brotherhood side of things. Say what you want about
how they've overused the character in the first two films, but Romijin has
actually grown into a decent actress in the last few years. Losing her feels
like a punch in the gut to the credibility of the Brotherhood. Oh, and did I
forget to mention the lack of decent action pieces? The Beast infiltration
of the Worthington Industries lab isn't bad, but it's written as if it's a
60-second montage, not a driving scene. Magneto's break-in of the prison
could be interesting, too, but it's certainly not written as such on the
page. The director is going to have to have vision to pull off both of these
sequences, which leads to.

Good luck to the director who takes on this project. Vaughn probably knew
this one was about to blow up in his face, and that's why he ran. Maybe a
strong writer can come in and still make this an effective script, but the
main plot, and the utter oblivion of [ONE OF THE CHARACTERS] especially, are
currently a death knell in this project. And now that Ratner's aboard, well,
good luck X-Fans is more like it.

Hope this message finds you and finds you well.

The Big Hurt

Regarding the Ratner issue, here's what I'm thinking. I think he's an
entirely competent but uninspired filmmaker. I don't hate his movies. There
are moments where actors do nice work in his films, particularly in THE
FAMILY MAN, where Tea Leoni, Nic Cage, and that amazing little girl all
manage to overcome a by-the-numbers bit of treacle, and I think his films
look really nice. Ratner surrounds himself with people who pick up the
slack. The idea of Lalo Schifrin writing a score for an X-MEN movie gives me
wood. I'm sure he'll have a top-flight cinematographer and an amazing
second-unit guy, so the action should be strong. We've still got the X-MEN
cast in place, and Famke Janssen being front and center as Jean Grey is a
good thing. She's been waiting to really run with this character since she
started, and she should be a blast to watch. Kelsey Grammer is a perfect
choice for this particular version of The Beast, since he's more politician
than action hero, and Kelsey's got exactly the right charisma to pull that
off. If you're looking to find something to get upset about, it seems like
Ratner's the least of the problems that this film has. I'd be more concerned
about how two of the elder statesmen of the series are going to be leaving,
and what that means for the franchise as a whole. I'd be more concerned
about pushing Halle Berry, whose contempt for the series almost matches
Rothman's, into the center of things. And I'd be especially concerned about
marginalizing Wolverine, who is the undisputed star of the series so far.
Don't piss Hugh off, guys, because you're going to need him to rebuild if
this one doesn't work. And before you yell at me for not giving you the
spoilers about who dies, I can tell you that the set-up to the film lays it
all out pretty neatly. Read the review again. You know who dies. It's all
right there.
The real problems are two-fold: money and time. By committing to that
release date, Fox has also committed to spending whatever they have to, and
they may well find themselves cutting sequences or characters simply because
of budget. Let's say Zak Penn and Simon Kinberg have cracked the problems
with the script and they've managed to find a way to make that cure
storyline something that (A) isn't going to make Joss Whedon feel like he's
been ripped off and (B) isn't an exact retread of the Stryker storyline in
the second film. Let's say the script is now amazing. When Fox runs up
against the realities of getting this film onscreen when they say they're
going to, all we have to do is look at Rothman's behavior in the past to
anticipate what's going to happen.
In a perfect world, Fox would blink. I've even heard whispers that, given
the proper motivation, DeSanto and Singer and Dougherty and Harris would be
more than happy to come back and, at the very least, brainstorm with the
team that's in place to try to make this thing great. No one wants to watch
something they poured so much personal energy into crumble. No one, that
seems, except the upper brass at Fox.
Forget the Sentinels. Forget Magneto. It's Tom Rothman and his personal
Brotherhood, guys like Alex Young and Hutch Parker, who are poised to
finally kill off Xavier's students once and for all.
For now, thanks to TheBigHurt, who did a hell of a job, and to you guys for
your patience. Hope it was worth the wait. I'll be back this week with
reviews of THE ARISTOCRATS, BEWITCHED, BROKEN FLOWERS, MARCH OF THE
PENGUINS, my new DVD SHELF, and a few script reviews of my own. Until
then...
"Moriarty" out.
--
--
"Is this a case of your equipment malfunctioning? Have you been suffering
from some premature pyro? Hey Silent Bob, you can say anything anytime.
Hello? Maybe I'll just bring Lita down right now. I have a better idea. Why
don't I buy you a box of Kleenex, a carton of Hagan Daz. I'll take you to
Blockbuster Video then you can rent the Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya
Sisterhood. Go home and have a really good cry. What do you think about
that, Junior? "
- Chris Jericho, 9:57pm
the Bede
2005-06-13 17:10:08 UTC
Permalink
"It stinks!"--Jay Sherman
Justin Samuels
2005-06-14 20:50:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by the Bede
"It stinks!"--Jay Sherman
I love it.

It's nice to see new things. Also, if Dark Phoenix is destructive force
of nature, Marvel should have shown it to us awhile ago. Not by just
having her kill of a bunch of nameless, faceless Asparagus people. But
by having her kill an X-Man. Would the X-Men have been so eager to
forgive Jean if she had killed an X-Man?

So I like the idea of her destroying Cyclops, who was nothing more than
a throw away character in the movie universe.
the Bede
2005-06-15 00:48:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Justin Samuels
Post by the Bede
"It stinks!"--Jay Sherman
I love it.
It's nice to see new things. Also, if Dark Phoenix is destructive force
of nature, Marvel should have shown it to us awhile ago. Not by just
having her kill of a bunch of nameless, faceless Asparagus people. But
by having her kill an X-Man. Would the X-Men have been so eager to
forgive Jean if she had killed an X-Man?
So I like the idea of her destroying Cyclops, who was nothing more than
a throw away character in the movie universe.
Rule #1: the movie universe should not kill off people who are still around
in the source-material universe. not if you plan on doing any more sequels,
that is.
Lord Hatred
2005-06-15 00:51:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by the Bede
Post by Justin Samuels
Post by the Bede
"It stinks!"--Jay Sherman
I love it.
It's nice to see new things. Also, if Dark Phoenix is destructive force
of nature, Marvel should have shown it to us awhile ago. Not by just
having her kill of a bunch of nameless, faceless Asparagus people. But
by having her kill an X-Man. Would the X-Men have been so eager to
forgive Jean if she had killed an X-Man?
So I like the idea of her destroying Cyclops, who was nothing more than
a throw away character in the movie universe.
Rule #1: the movie universe should not kill off people who are still around
in the source-material universe. not if you plan on doing any more sequels,
that is.
Rule #1 is broken quite often.
--
Stefan
http://www.livejournal.com/users/lord_hatred/
jay
2005-06-15 02:27:31 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:01:34 -0400, "The Matt Hardy Show Aficiando"
This is the guy who chased Roland Emmerich and Dean
Devlin off an ID4 sequel after they made $600 million for
the studio because he wanted to pay them half of what
they made on the first film.
That wasn't villainous--it was a public service. Whatever
Rothman's sins may be, stopping the atrocity that was ID4
from becoming a franchise (if he, in fact, was responsible)
wasn't one of them.
This is the man who browbeat Stephen Norrington until
he quit the business altogether.
Here, again, not much of a loss.
This is the guy who almost convinced Alex Proyas to
give up filmmaking.
This would have been a crime until recently--after "I,Robot,"
however, it, too, would perhaps be seen as a mercy-killing.
ALIEN VS PREDATOR marked the end of two franchises
at the same time.
To the contrary, AVP2 is supposed to be in the works as
we speak. Creatively speaking, both franchises were killed
when they became franchises--everything after the first
entries was a waste of space.
Here's the thing about X-MEN. It may be one of the most
flexible and durable film franchises I've ever seen. By
the very nature of who the X-Men are, you can rotate
cast in and out of the series without having to scrap
continuity. This is already off to a better financial
and creative start than the Bond franchise was, and you
see the legs on that one. Why, then, would you allow
a personal grudge to lead you to make decisions that
will not only kill the golden goose, but also rape it
and eat it?
This "personal grudge" thing sounds like a lot of
speculation, but there's no doubt that what you describe is
exactly what we're in for with X-3. The choice of Ratner
made that crystal clear. And you're right about how insane
this is. "X-Men," as a high-dollar franchise, could have
gone on nearly forever, and, instead, it's been turned over
to Bozo the Clown. There's every indication that Fox is
about to lay another reeking turd on us in the form of the
Fantastic Four, another could-have-been franchise with
nearly limitless potential--instead, it will probably die with
the first.
Regarding the Ratner issue, here's what I'm thinking.
I think he's an entirely competent but uninspired
filmmaker.
Well, you're half-right.
I don't hate his movies.
...which, alas, pretty handily destroys your credibility as
a judge of such things. Ratner was *the* key decision
wrt X-3. It doesn't matter that the movie may have a cool
score. It certainly doesn't matter that Halle Berry is in it. It
doesn't matter that the film doesn't devote half its
screen-time to Wolverine. The script, if it turns out to be
as you describe it, is shit, the director is shit, the movie
will be shit.

Loading...