X-Men 3

[The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland]

Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005

Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia, IGN FilmForce have confirmed
that Dark Phoenix (Famke Janssen) will indeed be the villain of the next,
Singer-less "X-Men" sequel.

Apparently Dark Phoenix - the new alter ego of X-Gal Jean Grey, who, in the
comics had the power to destroy the entire Universe. But in the end, good
triumphed and she destroyed herself to prevent such an occurrence - will be
the - ahem - Rogue of "X-Men 3", but that doesn't mean she'll be the only
focus of the film. She's a mere slice off the fat block of cheese it seems.

Rumours that 'The Sentinels' would be the villain-to-pop in the second
sequel have seemingly fallen flat. They won't be seen this time around
either it seems.

According to the abovementioned site, "X-Men 3" will, in addition to the
'Dark Phoenix' yarn, largely concentrate on Wolverine's (Hugh Jackman)
continuing growth as a vital member of the X-Men.

Meantime, Marvel big-wig Avi Arad helped Empire Online clear up some of the
other rumours about the super sequel.

Firstly, is 'Angel' going to be a girl? "It won't be a female Angel," Arad
told the site. "I don't know where that came from. Maybe it's because he
looks angelic."

Probed whether Gambit and Beast, as rumoured, will be involved this time -
Arad kept mum. "[There are] interesting characters that will be introduced.
It just has to move forward", he said. "Obviously, we have Wolverine and
Magneto, Professor X, Storm, Cyclops, Nightcrawler, Rogue, all these
characters. But then you need to freshen up the story and make it new".

And yes, James Marsden - whose busy with a role in "Superman" - will be back
it seems - but his character, Cyclops, will be spending most of the pic on
the sidelines.


--
Hey can I use your guys's phone for a sec?
Is there anything wrong?
I don't feel very good.
Hi.
Is grandma there?
No, she's getting her hair done.
Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...
What do you need?
Can you just go get her for me?
I'm really busy right now.
Just tell her to come get me.
Why?
Cause I don't feel good!
Well, have you talked to the school nurse?
No, she doesn't know anything. Will you just come get me?
No.
Well, will you do me a favor then? Can you bring me my chapstick?
No, Napoleon.
But my lips hurt real bad!
Just borrow some from the school nurse. I know she has like five sticks in
her drawer.
I'm not gonna use hers, you sicko!
See ya
Ugh! Idiot!

[David]

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:42:06 -0500, "The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005
According to the abovementioned site, "X-Men 3" will, in addition to the
'Dark Phoenix' yarn, largely concentrate on Wolverine's (Hugh Jackman)
continuing growth as a vital member of the X-Men.

SHOCK!!!

[The Vick]

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005
Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia, IGN FilmForce have confirmed
that Dark Phoenix (Famke Janssen) will indeed be the villain of the next,
Singer-less "X-Men" sequel.
Apparently Dark Phoenix - the new alter ego of X-Gal Jean Grey, who, in the
comics had the power to destroy the entire Universe. But in the end, good
triumphed and she destroyed herself to prevent such an occurrence - will be
the - ahem - Rogue of "X-Men 3", but that doesn't mean she'll be the only
focus of the film. She's a mere slice off the fat block of cheese it seems.

didn't she die at the end of X-2? then again, when have films ever
followed the comic book stories?

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Rumours that 'The Sentinels' would be the villain-to-pop in the second
sequel have seemingly fallen flat. They won't be seen this time around
either it seems.
According to the abovementioned site, "X-Men 3" will, in addition to the
'Dark Phoenix' yarn, largely concentrate on Wolverine's (Hugh Jackman)
continuing growth as a vital member of the X-Men.
Meantime, Marvel big-wig Avi Arad helped Empire Online clear up some of the
other rumours about the super sequel.
Firstly, is 'Angel' going to be a girl? "It won't be a female Angel," Arad
told the site. "I don't know where that came from. Maybe it's because he
looks angelic."
Probed whether Gambit and Beast, as rumoured, will be involved this time -
Arad kept mum. "[There are] interesting characters that will be introduced.
It just has to move forward", he said. "Obviously, we have Wolverine and
Magneto, Professor X, Storm, Cyclops, Nightcrawler, Rogue, all these
characters. But then you need to freshen up the story and make it new".

no Gambit again? it's not like he's a member of La Résistance...

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
And yes, James Marsden - whose busy with a role in "Superman" - will be back
it seems - but his character, Cyclops, will be spending most of the pic on
the sidelines.

[Dirty Redpool]

Post by The Vick

Post by David
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:42:06 -0500, "The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And
Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005
Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia, IGN FilmForce have confirmed
that Dark Phoenix (Famke Janssen) will indeed be the villain of the next,
Singer-less "X-Men" sequel.
Apparently Dark Phoenix - the new alter ego of X-Gal Jean Grey, who, in the
comics had the power to destroy the entire Universe. But in the end, good
triumphed and she destroyed herself to prevent such an occurrence - will be
the - ahem - Rogue of "X-Men 3", but that doesn't mean she'll be the only
focus of the film. She's a mere slice off the fat block of cheese it seems.

didn't she die at the end of X-2? then again, when have films ever
followed the comic book stories?

Yeah she did "die", which TOTALLY follows the comic book stories. If she
didn't die, the Dark Phoenix story wouldn't be possible...

Post by The Vick
no Gambit again? it's not like he's a member of La Résistance...

There's been no definite answer as to whether he'll be in. Even if he is in,
it'll probably (sadly) be a small role.

--

[CleV]

Post by The Vick

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005
Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia, IGN FilmForce have confirmed
that Dark Phoenix (Famke Janssen) will indeed be the villain of the next,
Singer-less "X-Men" sequel.
Apparently Dark Phoenix - the new alter ego of X-Gal Jean Grey, who, in the
comics had the power to destroy the entire Universe. But in the end, good
triumphed and she destroyed herself to prevent such an occurrence - will be
the - ahem - Rogue of "X-Men 3", but that doesn't mean she'll be the only
focus of the film. She's a mere slice off the fat block of cheese it seems.

didn't she die at the end of X-2? then again, when have films ever
followed the comic book stories?

Yes, she died, and that's why it IS following the comic book story ...

[Brad]

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Probed whether Gambit and Beast, as rumoured, will be involved this time -
Arad kept mum. "[There are] interesting characters that will be introduced.
It just has to move forward", he said. "Obviously, we have Wolverine and
Magneto, Professor X, Storm, Cyclops, Nightcrawler, Rogue, all these
characters. But then you need to freshen up the story and make it new".

Colossus is planned to show in this one. He was in a few scenes as an older
Prof X student helping the others flee the mansion as the swat-style guys
burst in.

Pyro sounds to likely be portrayed some more as well

[Lynley James]

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:42:06 -0500, "The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005
Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia, IGN FilmForce have confirmed
that Dark Phoenix (Famke Janssen) will indeed be the villain of the next,
Singer-less "X-Men" sequel.
Apparently Dark Phoenix - the new alter ego of X-Gal Jean Grey, who, in the
comics had the power to destroy the entire Universe. But in the end, good
triumphed and she destroyed herself to prevent such an occurrence - will be
the - ahem - Rogue of "X-Men 3", but that doesn't mean she'll be the only
focus of the film. She's a mere slice off the fat block of cheese it seems.
Rumours that 'The Sentinels' would be the villain-to-pop in the second
sequel have seemingly fallen flat. They won't be seen this time around
either it seems.
According to the abovementioned site, "X-Men 3" will, in addition to the
'Dark Phoenix' yarn, largely concentrate on Wolverine's (Hugh Jackman)
continuing growth as a vital member of the X-Men.

Why oh why don't they just hold on till the Wolverine movie? Keep
this a team flick without having Wolverine take over the wholen thing.


Lynley

[Sneaky P]

storm??

i thought halle berry told them she wanted more money and they gave her
walking papers
who's playing storm no?


"The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland"

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005
Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia, IGN FilmForce have confirmed
that Dark Phoenix (Famke Janssen) will indeed be the villain of the next,
Singer-less "X-Men" sequel.
Apparently Dark Phoenix - the new alter ego of X-Gal Jean Grey, who, in the
comics had the power to destroy the entire Universe. But in the end, good
triumphed and she destroyed herself to prevent such an occurrence - will be
the - ahem - Rogue of "X-Men 3", but that doesn't mean she'll be the only
focus of the film. She's a mere slice off the fat block of cheese it seems.
Rumours that 'The Sentinels' would be the villain-to-pop in the second
sequel have seemingly fallen flat. They won't be seen this time around
either it seems.
According to the abovementioned site, "X-Men 3" will, in addition to the
'Dark Phoenix' yarn, largely concentrate on Wolverine's (Hugh Jackman)
continuing growth as a vital member of the X-Men.
Meantime, Marvel big-wig Avi Arad helped Empire Online clear up some of the
other rumours about the super sequel.
Firstly, is 'Angel' going to be a girl? "It won't be a female Angel," Arad
told the site. "I don't know where that came from. Maybe it's because he
looks angelic."
Probed whether Gambit and Beast, as rumoured, will be involved this time -
Arad kept mum. "[There are] interesting characters that will be introduced.
It just has to move forward", he said. "Obviously, we have Wolverine and
Magneto, Professor X, Storm, Cyclops, Nightcrawler, Rogue, all these
characters. But then you need to freshen up the story and make it new".
And yes, James Marsden - whose busy with a role in "Superman" - will be back
it seems - but his character, Cyclops, will be spending most of the pic on
the sidelines.
--
Hey can I use your guys's phone for a sec?
Is there anything wrong?
I don't feel very good.
Hi.
Is grandma there?
No, she's getting her hair done.
Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...
What do you need?
Can you just go get her for me?
I'm really busy right now.
Just tell her to come get me.
Why?
Cause I don't feel good!
Well, have you talked to the school nurse?
No, she doesn't know anything. Will you just come get me?
No.
Well, will you do me a favor then? Can you bring me my chapstick?
No, Napoleon.
But my lips hurt real bad!
Just borrow some from the school nurse. I know she has like five sticks in
her drawer.
I'm not gonna use hers, you sicko!
See ya
Ugh! Idiot!

[Jon J. Yeager]

Post by Sneaky P
storm??
i thought halle berry told them she wanted more money and they gave her
walking papers
who's playing storm no?

Remember that old "telephone" game? Everytime someone repeats something they
heard, they add a li'l bit more to it. Halle is neither "on" or "off" X3.
And she doesn't have to be until they start shooting.

Jon
--
"How are Flatman or Doorman's names anymore silly
than Iron Man or Giant Man's? I bet they would have
named Cap "Shield Man" if they'd have thought of it."

[grinningdemon]

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:42:06 -0500, "The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005
Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia, IGN FilmForce have confirmed
that Dark Phoenix (Famke Janssen) will indeed be the villain of the next,
Singer-less "X-Men" sequel.
Apparently Dark Phoenix - the new alter ego of X-Gal Jean Grey, who, in the
comics had the power to destroy the entire Universe. But in the end, good
triumphed and she destroyed herself to prevent such an occurrence - will be
the - ahem - Rogue of "X-Men 3", but that doesn't mean she'll be the only
focus of the film. She's a mere slice off the fat block of cheese it seems.
Rumours that 'The Sentinels' would be the villain-to-pop in the second
sequel have seemingly fallen flat. They won't be seen this time around
either it seems.
According to the abovementioned site, "X-Men 3" will, in addition to the
'Dark Phoenix' yarn, largely concentrate on Wolverine's (Hugh Jackman)
continuing growth as a vital member of the X-Men.

Who would have thought...why don't they just change the name of the
movie (and the comics for that matter) to Wolverine featuring bit
parts by the X-Men.

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Meantime, Marvel big-wig Avi Arad helped Empire Online clear up some of the
other rumours about the super sequel.
Firstly, is 'Angel' going to be a girl? "It won't be a female Angel," Arad
told the site. "I don't know where that came from. Maybe it's because he
looks angelic."
Probed whether Gambit and Beast, as rumoured, will be involved this time -
Arad kept mum. "[There are] interesting characters that will be introduced.
It just has to move forward", he said. "Obviously, we have Wolverine and
Magneto, Professor X, Storm, Cyclops, Nightcrawler, Rogue, all these
characters. But then you need to freshen up the story and make it new".

I think adding more characters is a mistake since they obviously can't
do justice to the ones they already have...except Wolverine.

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
And yes, James Marsden - whose busy with a role in "Superman" - will be back
it seems - but his character, Cyclops, will be spending most of the pic on
the sidelines.

You've got to be kidding me...this is the Dark Phoenix Saga and
Cyclops is going to spend most of the movie on the sidelines...next to
Jean, Cyclops had the biggest role in the Dark Phoenix Saga and it was
the emotional connection between the two that saved the day...if they
substitute Wolverine in this role I think I'll vomit.

[Gumby (re-connected)]

"The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland"

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005
Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia, IGN FilmForce have confirmed
that Dark Phoenix (Famke Janssen) will indeed be the villain of the next,
Singer-less "X-Men" sequel.
Apparently Dark Phoenix - the new alter ego of X-Gal Jean Grey, who, in the
comics had the power to destroy the entire Universe. But in the end, good
triumphed and she destroyed herself to prevent such an occurrence - will be
the - ahem - Rogue of "X-Men 3", but that doesn't mean she'll be the only
focus of the film. She's a mere slice off the fat block of cheese it seems.
Rumours that 'The Sentinels' would be the villain-to-pop in the second
sequel have seemingly fallen flat. They won't be seen this time around
either it seems.
According to the abovementioned site, "X-Men 3" will, in addition to the
'Dark Phoenix' yarn, largely concentrate on Wolverine's (Hugh Jackman)
continuing growth as a vital member of the X-Men.
Meantime, Marvel big-wig Avi Arad helped Empire Online clear up some of the
other rumours about the super sequel.
Firstly, is 'Angel' going to be a girl? "It won't be a female Angel," Arad
told the site. "I don't know where that came from. Maybe it's because he
looks angelic."
Probed whether Gambit and Beast, as rumoured, will be involved this time -
Arad kept mum. "[There are] interesting characters that will be introduced.
It just has to move forward", he said. "Obviously, we have Wolverine and
Magneto, Professor X, Storm, Cyclops, Nightcrawler, Rogue, all these
characters. But then you need to freshen up the story and make it new".
And yes, James Marsden - whose busy with a role in "Superman" - will be back
it seems - but his character, Cyclops, will be spending most of the pic on
the sidelines.

I will be happy if they just do Colossus and Kitty Pryde properly......

And bring in Juggernaught or someone for Magneto's team..... please?

[Peter]

In article <ac791$424823a8$42416448$***@allthenewsgroups.com>, The
Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Phoenix flies in X-Men 3
Posted on Sun, 27-Mar-2005
Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia,

*blinks* does the writer think we don't have electricity too?

[Rockboy]

Post by Peter

Post by The Love Child Of Amy Dumas And Adam Copeland
Thought it has been rumoured more times than mutterings of a a second
commercial Television network in Australia,

*blinks* does the writer think we don't have electricity too?

Wait, you do now?